Our Harvard-educated consultants have implemented both Microsoft Teams and RingCentral for Australian businesses. Here is what 12+ of experience has taught us about choosing between them.
Side-by-side feature ratings for Microsoft Teams and RingCentral.
| Feature | Microsoft Teams | RingCentral | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Messaging features | When it comes to messaging features, RingCentral pulls clearly ahead of Microsoft Teams — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team. | ||
| Video and audio quality | For Professional Services that rely on strong video and audio quality, RingCentral is the more capable option in our assessment. | ||
| File sharing | Both Microsoft Teams and RingCentral offer comparable file sharing capabilities. | ||
| Team channels | For Professional Services that rely on strong team channels, RingCentral is the more capable option in our assessment. | ||
| Search and history | When it comes to search and history, Microsoft Teams pulls clearly ahead of RingCentral — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team. | ||
| Security and compliance | Microsoft Teams has a notable advantage in security and compliance. | ||
| Mobile experience | RingCentral has a notable advantage in mobile experience. | ||
| Third-party integrations | When it comes to third-party integrations, Microsoft Teams pulls clearly ahead of RingCentral — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team. | ||
| Admin controls | When it comes to admin controls, Microsoft Teams pulls clearly ahead of RingCentral — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team. | ||
| Notification management | Microsoft Teams has a notable advantage in notification management. | ||
| Ease of setup | Microsoft Teams significantly outperforms RingCentral on ease of setup, making it the stronger choice for businesses that prioritise this area. | ||
| Value for money | Microsoft Teams significantly outperforms RingCentral on value for money, making it the stronger choice for businesses that prioritise this area. |
Messaging features
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
When it comes to messaging features, RingCentral pulls clearly ahead of Microsoft Teams — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team.
Video and audio quality
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
For Professional Services that rely on strong video and audio quality, RingCentral is the more capable option in our assessment.
File sharing
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
Both Microsoft Teams and RingCentral offer comparable file sharing capabilities.
Team channels
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
For Professional Services that rely on strong team channels, RingCentral is the more capable option in our assessment.
Search and history
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
When it comes to search and history, Microsoft Teams pulls clearly ahead of RingCentral — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team.
Security and compliance
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
Microsoft Teams has a notable advantage in security and compliance.
Mobile experience
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
RingCentral has a notable advantage in mobile experience.
Third-party integrations
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
When it comes to third-party integrations, Microsoft Teams pulls clearly ahead of RingCentral — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team.
Admin controls
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
When it comes to admin controls, Microsoft Teams pulls clearly ahead of RingCentral — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team.
Notification management
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
Microsoft Teams has a notable advantage in notification management.
Ease of setup
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
Microsoft Teams significantly outperforms RingCentral on ease of setup, making it the stronger choice for businesses that prioritise this area.
Value for money
Microsoft Teams
RingCentral
Microsoft Teams significantly outperforms RingCentral on value for money, making it the stronger choice for businesses that prioritise this area.
General pricing information for each platform.
Included with Microsoft 365 from ~$9/user/month
Pricing is indicative only and subject to change. We recommend contacting the vendor for a tailored quote based on your Australian business needs.
From ~$30/user/month
Prices shown are approximate and may differ based on your plan, team size, and billing cycle. Verify directly with the vendor for current AUD rates.
An honest look at the strengths and limitations of each platform.
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Which tool suits which use case.
Our Harvard-educated consultants' take on this comparison.
Microsoft Teams has a significantly broader integration ecosystem than RingCentral, which can be a decisive factor if you rely on connecting multiple tools. That said, RingCentral may still be the better choice if its core features align more closely with your needs. Clever Ops evaluates the full picture — not just integration counts — when advising mid-market Australian businesses.
What to know about switching between Microsoft Teams and RingCentral.
Since Microsoft Teams and RingCentral are both communication tools, they share similar data structures — making migration more predictable. Clever Ops maps messages, meetings, calls along with custom fields, automations, and workflows. We have completed similar communication migrations many times and typically finish within 4-8 weeks.
Other popular comparisons involving Microsoft Teams or RingCentral.
Already decided? See how to integrate Microsoft Teams and RingCentral seamlessly.
Join 50+ Australian businesses that trust Clever Ops for objective, vendor-neutral technology advice.