Skip to main content
Clever Ops - AI Business Automation Australia
Teamwork vs Todoist

Teamwork vs Todoist: Which Project Management Tool Wins in 2026?

Thinking of switching from Teamwork to Todoist (or vice versa)? This comparison covers features, costs, and migration considerations to help mid-market Australian businesses make an informed decision.

12
Features compared
50+
Clients advised
98%
Client retention
12+
Years experience

Feature Comparison

Side-by-side feature analysis for Teamwork and Todoist.

Task management

Teamwork

Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need

Todoist

Natural language task input ("Meeting with Sarah tomorrow at 3pm #work p1") creates tasks with dates, projects, and priorities from a single typed line

Both platforms are strong here. Teamwork emphasises this as a core strength, and Todoist also invests heavily in task management. Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.

Project views (board/list/timeline)

Teamwork

Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box

Todoist

Natural language task input ("Meeting with Sarah tomorrow at 3pm #work p1") creates tasks with dates, projects, and priorities from a single typed line

Both platforms are strong here. Teamwork emphasises this as a core strength, and Todoist also invests heavily in project views (board/list/timeline). Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.

Resource management

Teamwork

Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need

Todoist

Limitation: Team features (shared projects, comments, task assignment) are basic compared to dedicated project management tools like Asana or Monday

Teamwork highlights resource management as a core strength. Todoist offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.

Time tracking

Teamwork

Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need

Todoist

Filters and labels provide powerful task organisation that scales from personal to-do lists to team project tracking without complexity

Both platforms are strong here. Teamwork emphasises this as a core strength, and Todoist also invests heavily in time tracking. Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.

Collaboration tools

Teamwork

Teamwork includes team collaboration features. Multi-user capabilities vary by plan tier

Todoist

Limitation: Team features (shared projects, comments, task assignment) are basic compared to dedicated project management tools like Asana or Monday

collaboration tools capabilities vary by plan tier on both platforms. Confirm the specific features you need are available at your target price point before committing.

Reporting and dashboards

Teamwork

Limitation: Reporting depth requires the higher-tier plans, with basic plans offering limited dashboard customisation and export options

Todoist

Limitation: Limited reporting means managers cannot track team velocity, completion rates, or project progress without manual analysis

Teamwork and Todoist take different philosophical approaches to reporting and dashboards; the better fit is usually the one that matches how your team already thinks about the problem.

Customisation and templates

Teamwork

Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box

Todoist

Todoist manages tasks, projects, sections, labels and 2 more object types

Teamwork highlights customisation and templates as a core strength. Todoist offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.

Automations

Teamwork

Client-facing features including branded project portals, approval workflows, and shared notebooks keep external stakeholders informed

Todoist

Todoist supports automations. Advanced automation features may require higher-tier plans

Teamwork and Todoist take different philosophical approaches to automations; the better fit is usually the one that matches how your team already thinks about the problem.

Third-party integrations

Teamwork

Limitation: Marketplace integrations are fewer than Monday.com, Asana, or ClickUp, sometimes requiring Zapier for connections

Todoist

Todoist supports 38+ native integrations, covering the most common tools in a mid-market tech stack

Both platforms have similar integration breadth (43 and 38 native connectors respectively). Either will connect to the major tools in a mid-market stack.

Mobile experience

Teamwork

Teamwork offers a mobile experience. Check the vendor site for current mobile app capabilities

Todoist

Todoist offers a mobile experience. Check the vendor site for current mobile app capabilities

Teamwork and Todoist take different philosophical approaches to mobile experience; the better fit is usually the one that matches how your team already thinks about the problem.

Ease of setup

Teamwork

Teamwork provides onboarding resources. Setup complexity depends on your configuration requirements

Todoist

Todoist may require guided implementation for complex setups

ease of setup support varies across Teamwork and Todoist's plan tiers. Check whether the capabilities you need are on the plan you can actually afford.

Value for money

Teamwork

Free plan for up to 5 users. Deliver from approximately $13.99/user/month, Grow from approximately $25.99/user/month, Scale custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Time tracking included on all paid plans.

Todoist

Free plan (5 active projects, unlimited tasks). Pro from approximately $7/month, Business from approximately $9/user/month (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Individual and team plans available.

Pricing models differ significantly. Compare the total cost of ownership including add-ons and per-user fees, not just the headline price.

Pricing Comparison

General pricing information for each platform.

Teamwork

Free plan for up to 5 users. Deliver from approximately $13.99/user/month, Grow from approximately $25.99/user/month, Scale custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Time tracking included on all paid plans.

Pricing is indicative only and subject to change. We recommend contacting the vendor for a tailored quote based on your Australian business needs.

Todoist

Free plan (5 active projects, unlimited tasks). Pro from approximately $7/month, Business from approximately $9/user/month (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Individual and team plans available.

These figures are estimates based on publicly available pricing. Actual costs depend on your usage, team size, and any negotiated rates.

Pros & Cons

An honest look at the strengths and limitations of each platform.

Teamwork

Pros

  • Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need
  • Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box
  • Client-facing features including branded project portals, approval workflows, and shared notebooks keep external stakeholders informed
  • Built-in invoicing from tracked time and expenses creates a direct path from project work to client billing
  • Workload management with capacity planning helps managers balance team assignments across concurrent projects

Cons

  • Per-user pricing with relatively high entry points makes Teamwork more expensive than alternatives for small teams not fully utilising project features
  • The interface, while functional, is less visually polished than Monday.com or Asana, which can affect first impressions during team onboarding
  • Reporting depth requires the higher-tier plans, with basic plans offering limited dashboard customisation and export options
  • Marketplace integrations are fewer than Monday.com, Asana, or ClickUp, sometimes requiring Zapier for connections

Todoist

Pros

  • Natural language task input ("Meeting with Sarah tomorrow at 3pm #work p1") creates tasks with dates, projects, and priorities from a single typed line
  • Cross-platform availability on every major OS (iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, web, browser extensions) with instant sync means tasks are always accessible
  • Karma system and streaks gamify task completion, helping individuals maintain productivity habits and daily momentum
  • Filters and labels provide powerful task organisation that scales from personal to-do lists to team project tracking without complexity
  • Free plan is genuinely useful with up to 5 projects, unlimited tasks, and core features, making it a real option for individuals and small teams

Cons

  • Team features (shared projects, comments, task assignment) are basic compared to dedicated project management tools like Asana or Monday
  • No Gantt charts, dependencies, or workload management means Todoist cannot handle complex multi-person project scheduling
  • Reminders and notifications are locked behind the Pro plan, which feels restrictive for a feature many consider basic
  • Limited reporting means managers cannot track team velocity, completion rates, or project progress without manual analysis

Best For

Which tool suits which use case.

Choose Teamwork if you need

  • Complex data models (projects, tasks, milestones and more)
  • Professional Services businesses
  • Workflow management
  • Teams needing extensive third-party integrations
  • Real-time data sync across platforms

Choose Todoist if you need

  • Moderate data needs (tasks, projects)
  • Team collaboration
  • Resource planning
  • Teams needing extensive third-party integrations
  • Professional Services businesses

Expert Verdict

Our Harvard-educated consultants' take on this comparison.

Clever Ops Recommendation

Choose Teamwork if agencies, consultancies, and professional services firms that bill clients for time and need project management with built-in time tracking, budgets, and client-facing project portals. Choose Todoist if individuals and small teams that need a fast, cross-platform task manager with natural language input and habit-forming productivity features. Avoid Teamwork if internal teams that do not bill for client work, or small teams where the per-user cost is hard to justify against free or lower-cost alternatives like Trello or ClickUp. Avoid Todoist if teams managing complex projects with dependencies, resource allocation, and reporting needs, or organisations needing advanced collaboration features beyond task assignment. If you are still weighing the trade-offs, Clever Ops offers a free assessment where our Harvard-educated consultants map your requirements to the right platform.

Migration Notes

What to know about switching between Teamwork and Todoist.

Migrating Between Teamwork and Todoist

Both Teamwork and Todoist support webhooks, which means Clever Ops can set up real-time data sync between the platforms during the migration period. This keeps both systems current while your team transitions. We handle the migration of projects, tasks, custom fields, and workflows - typically within 4-8 weeks - with 3 months of post-migration support.

Teamwork vs Todoist FAQ

Yes. Both platforms share 2 common data object types (including projects, tasks), which simplifies field mapping. Clever Ops runs a structured migration process: discovery, data mapping, test migration, verification, and cutover. Most migrations complete within 4-8 weeks, with 3 months of post-migration support included.

Both Teamwork and Todoist serve Education businesses. Teamwork is also popular with Professional Services organisations, while Todoist is widely used in Professional Services. Clever Ops can advise based on what we have seen work for businesses like yours.

Teamwork strengths: Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need. Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box. Todoist strengths: Natural language task input ("Meeting with Sarah tomorrow at 3pm #work p1") creates tasks with dates, projects, and priorities from a single typed line. Cross-platform availability on every major OS (iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, web, browser extensions) with instant sync means tasks are always accessible. The features that matter most depend on your team's daily workflows and growth plans. Clever Ops can help you map your requirements to the right platform.

We audit your current workflows, team size, budget, and growth plans, then recommend the platform that fits. Our advice is vendor-neutral: we do not earn commissions from Teamwork, Todoist, or any vendor. Our Harvard-educated consultants have helped 50+ businesses make informed technology decisions over 12+. Book a free assessment to get started.

Teamwork limitations: Per-user pricing with relatively high entry points makes Teamwork more expensive than alternatives for small teams not fully utilising project features. The interface, while functional, is less visually polished than Monday.com or Asana, which can affect first impressions during team onboarding. Todoist limitations: Team features (shared projects, comments, task assignment) are basic compared to dedicated project management tools like Asana or Monday. No Gantt charts, dependencies, or workload management means Todoist cannot handle complex multi-person project scheduling. Understanding these trade-offs in the context of your specific workflows is critical. Clever Ops can help you weigh which limitations matter most for your business during a free assessment.

Teamwork uses a REST + Webhook API (REST API v3 with API key or OAuth 2.0 authentication. Rate limited to 150 requests per minute. Supports pagination via page and pageSize. JSON responses. Webhook support for project, task, and time entry events.), while Todoist uses a REST + Webhook API (REST API v2 with Bearer token authentication. Rate limited to 50 requests per minute. Supports Sync API for offline-capable applications. JSON responses. Webhook support for task and project events.). Teamwork supports 8 core data objects; Todoist supports 6. Teamwork supports webhooks for real-time sync. Todoist supports webhooks for real-time sync. With 12+ of integration experience, Clever Ops can tell you exactly how each API performs in production.

For Professional Services businesses, prioritise: Task management, Project views (board/list/timeline), Resource management, Time tracking, Collaboration tools. Teamwork is strong on Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need. Todoist excels at Natural language task input ("Meeting with Sarah tomorrow at 3pm #work p1") creates tasks with dates, projects, and priorities from a single typed line. Clever Ops can help you build a weighted requirements list and score each platform against it.

ROI depends on three factors: how well the platform is configured, how thoroughly your team adopts it, and how tightly it integrates with your other tools. Teamwork delivers value through Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need. Todoist delivers value through Natural language task input ("Meeting with Sarah tomorrow at 3pm #work p1") creates tasks with dates, projects, and priorities from a single typed line. A poorly set-up tool delivers less value than a well-implemented one, regardless of platform. Clever Ops focuses on maximising your return through proper implementation and ongoing optimisation.

Connect These Tools

Already decided? See how to integrate Teamwork and Todoist seamlessly.

Need Help Choosing?

Join 50+ Australian businesses that trust Clever Ops for objective, vendor-neutral technology advice.