Cliniko or Neto? How to Pick the Right Fit for Your Team
Wondering whether Cliniko or Neto is the better fit for Healthcare & Allied Health? We break down features, pricing, and real-world suitability so you can choose with confidence - backed by 12+ of hands-on experience.
Feature Comparison
Side-by-side feature analysis for Cliniko and Neto.
Industry fit
Cliniko
Cliniko provides industry fit functionality, popular with Healthcare & Allied Health businesses
Neto
Neto provides industry fit functionality, popular with Retail & E-commerce businesses
Cliniko and Neto take different philosophical approaches to industry fit; the better fit is usually the one that matches how your team already thinks about the problem.
Job management
Cliniko
Limitation: Inventory management for product sales (supplements, braces, etc.) is basic and requires workarounds or third-party tools
Neto
Built-in warehouse management with pick, pack, and ship workflows suits businesses handling their own fulfilment
Neto highlights job management as a core strength. Cliniko offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Quoting and invoicing
Cliniko
Cliniko provides quoting and invoicing functionality, popular with Healthcare & Allied Health businesses
Neto
Neto provides quoting and invoicing functionality, popular with Retail & E-commerce businesses
Edge cases in quoting and invoicing (bulk edits, exports, undo, permissions) are where Cliniko and Neto diverge; map your five toughest scenarios and reproduce them in each trial.
Scheduling and dispatch
Cliniko
Cliniko provides scheduling and dispatch functionality, popular with Healthcare & Allied Health businesses
Neto
Neto provides scheduling and dispatch functionality, popular with Retail & E-commerce businesses
scheduling and dispatch support varies across Cliniko and Neto's plan tiers. Check whether the capabilities you need are on the plan you can actually afford.
Mobile field access
Cliniko
Letter and report templates with merge fields generate professional referral letters and clinical reports in seconds
Neto
Neto manages orders, products, customers, inventory and 4 more object types
Cliniko highlights mobile field access as a core strength. Neto offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Compliance features
Cliniko
Limitation: Marketing and patient recall features are limited, often requiring integration with Mailchimp or similar for targeted campaigns
Neto
B2B features with customer-specific pricing, payment terms, and trade accounts cater to wholesale alongside retail selling
Neto highlights compliance features as a core strength. Cliniko offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Reporting
Cliniko
Letter and report templates with merge fields generate professional referral letters and clinical reports in seconds
Neto
Neto includes reporting capabilities. Feature depth varies by plan tier
Edge cases in reporting (bulk edits, exports, undo, permissions) are where Cliniko and Neto diverge; map your five toughest scenarios and reproduce them in each trial.
Client management
Cliniko
Limitation: Inventory management for product sales (supplements, braces, etc.) is basic and requires workarounds or third-party tools
Neto
Built-in warehouse management with pick, pack, and ship workflows suits businesses handling their own fulfilment
Neto highlights client management as a core strength. Cliniko offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Inventory and materials
Cliniko
Limitation: Inventory management for product sales (supplements, braces, etc.) is basic and requires workarounds or third-party tools
Neto
Australian-built platform (now Maropost Commerce Cloud) combining e-commerce, POS, inventory, and fulfilment in a single system
Neto highlights inventory and materials as a core strength. Cliniko offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Integrations with accounting
Cliniko
Purpose-built for allied health with patient records, treatment notes, telehealth, and Medicare/DVA claiming built into the workflow
Neto
Multi-channel selling across website, eBay, Amazon, and physical POS with synchronised inventory prevents overselling
Both platforms are strong here. Cliniko emphasises this as a core strength, and Neto also invests heavily in integrations with accounting. Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.
Ease of setup
Cliniko
Cliniko provides onboarding resources. Setup complexity depends on your configuration requirements
Neto
Neto provides onboarding resources. Setup complexity depends on your configuration requirements
On paper ease of setup looks similar across Cliniko and Neto, but the admin experience, reporting, and permission model tend to be the real differentiators.
Value for money
Cliniko
Solo from approximately $55/month (1 practitioner), Team from approximately $109/month (2-5 practitioners), Growing from approximately $179/month (6-10 practitioners), Large from approximately $279/month (AUD). Annual billing discounts.
Neto
Custom pricing based on revenue and order volume, typically from approximately $250-500+/month (AUD). Setup and migration fees apply. POS hardware sold separately. Annual contracts standard.
Pricing models differ significantly. Compare the total cost of ownership including add-ons and per-user fees, not just the headline price.
Pricing Comparison
General pricing information for each platform.
Cliniko
Solo from approximately $55/month (1 practitioner), Team from approximately $109/month (2-5 practitioners), Growing from approximately $179/month (6-10 practitioners), Large from approximately $279/month (AUD). Annual billing discounts.
These figures are estimates based on publicly available pricing. Actual costs depend on your usage, team size, and any negotiated rates.
Neto
Custom pricing based on revenue and order volume, typically from approximately $250-500+/month (AUD). Setup and migration fees apply. POS hardware sold separately. Annual contracts standard.
Pricing is indicative only and subject to change. We recommend contacting the vendor for a tailored quote based on your Australian business needs.
Pros & Cons
An honest look at the strengths and limitations of each platform.
Cliniko
Pros
- Purpose-built for allied health with patient records, treatment notes, telehealth, and Medicare/DVA claiming built into the workflow
- Online booking with practitioner availability, service selection, and intake forms reduces receptionist workload and fills empty appointment slots
- Telehealth video consultations are included at no extra cost, allowing practitioners to offer remote consultations without a separate Zoom subscription
- Letter and report templates with merge fields generate professional referral letters and clinical reports in seconds
- Australian data hosting with encryption at rest and in transit meets Australian privacy and health records requirements
Cons
- Per-practitioner pricing can be expensive for multi-disciplinary practices with many part-time practitioners
- Inventory management for product sales (supplements, braces, etc.) is basic and requires workarounds or third-party tools
- Marketing and patient recall features are limited, often requiring integration with Mailchimp or similar for targeted campaigns
- Customisation of clinical templates requires understanding of Cliniko template syntax, which has a learning curve
Neto
Pros
- Australian-built platform (now Maropost Commerce Cloud) combining e-commerce, POS, inventory, and fulfilment in a single system
- Multi-channel selling across website, eBay, Amazon, and physical POS with synchronised inventory prevents overselling
- Built-in warehouse management with pick, pack, and ship workflows suits businesses handling their own fulfilment
- B2B features with customer-specific pricing, payment terms, and trade accounts cater to wholesale alongside retail selling
- Xero and MYOB integration designed for Australian tax compliance with GST handling built into the platform
Cons
- Platform has undergone significant ownership changes (Neto to Maropost) creating uncertainty about long-term product direction
- Website design templates are limited compared to Shopify and Squarespace, often requiring developer customisation for modern designs
- Integration ecosystem is smaller than Shopify, with fewer third-party apps and extensions available
- Customer support quality has been inconsistent during the transition to Maropost, with longer response times reported
Best For
Which tool suits which use case.
Choose Cliniko if you need
- ✓ Healthcare & Allied Health businesses
- ✓ Field service operations
- ✓ Moderate data needs (patients, appointments)
- ✓ Teams needing extensive third-party integrations
- ✓ Specialised compliance
Choose Neto if you need
- ✓ Industry-specific workflows
- ✓ Complex data models (orders, products, customers and more)
- ✓ Manufacturing organisations
- ✓ Retail & E-commerce businesses
- ✓ Teams needing extensive third-party integrations
Expert Verdict
Our Harvard-educated consultants' take on this comparison.
Clever Ops Recommendation
Choose Cliniko if Australian allied health practices (physio, chiro, osteo, psychology, speech pathology) that need integrated patient management, online booking, and telehealth with Australian compliance built in. Choose Neto if Australian retail and wholesale businesses that need multi-channel selling with integrated warehouse management and POS, particularly those selling across marketplaces and their own website. Avoid Cliniko if medical practices needing GP-specific features (prescribing, pathology ordering) where Best Practice or Medical Director are more appropriate, or fitness businesses where Mindbody is better suited. Avoid Neto if businesses wanting the simplicity and app ecosystem of Shopify, or those concerned about platform stability during the ongoing Maropost transition. If you are still weighing the trade-offs, Clever Ops offers a free assessment where our Harvard-educated consultants map your requirements to the right platform.
Migration Notes
What to know about switching between Cliniko and Neto.
Migrating Between Cliniko and Neto
Since Cliniko and Neto are both industry tools tools, they share similar data structures - making migration more predictable. Clever Ops maps products along with custom fields, automations, and workflows. We have completed similar industry tools migrations many times and typically finish within 4-8 weeks.
Cliniko vs Neto FAQ
For Healthcare & Allied Health, the answer depends on your operational model. Cliniko is best for Australian allied health practices (physio, chiro, osteo, psychology, speech pathology) that need integrated patient management, online booking, and telehealth with Australian compliance built in. Neto is best for Australian retail and wholesale businesses that need multi-channel selling with integrated warehouse management and POS, particularly those selling across marketplaces and their own website. Clever Ops has helped businesses across Healthcare & Allied Health choose the right stack. Book a free assessment for advice specific to your situation.
Cliniko: Solo from approximately $55/month (1 practitioner), Team from approximately $109/month (2-5 practitioners), Growing from approximately $179/month (6-10 practitioners), Large from approximately $279/month (AUD). Annual billing discounts.. Neto: Custom pricing based on revenue and order volume, typically from approximately $250-500+/month (AUD). Setup and migration fees apply. POS hardware sold separately. Annual contracts standard.. When comparing costs, factor in per-user charges, add-on modules, and implementation costs, not just the headline price. Clever Ops can model the total cost of ownership for your team size during a free assessment.
Cliniko may hit limits when medical practices needing GP-specific features (prescribing, pathology ordering) where Best Practice or Medical Director are more appropriate, or fitness businesses where Mindbody is better suited. Neto may hit limits when businesses wanting the simplicity and app ecosystem of Shopify, or those concerned about platform stability during the ongoing Maropost transition. Both platforms are designed to grow with your business, but scaling experience varies. Cliniko connects with 44+ tools, and Neto with 35+, so integration flexibility at scale is comparable. Clever Ops helps mid-market Australian businesses plan their tech stack for growth, not just for today.
For Healthcare & Allied Health businesses, prioritise: Industry fit, Job management, Quoting and invoicing, Scheduling and dispatch, Mobile field access. Cliniko is strong on Purpose-built for allied health with patient records, treatment notes, telehealth, and Medicare/DVA claiming built into the workflow. Neto excels at Australian-built platform (now Maropost Commerce Cloud) combining e-commerce, POS, inventory, and fulfilment in a single system. Clever Ops can help you build a weighted requirements list and score each platform against it.
Neto is more commonly used in Retail & E-commerce. Cliniko is stronger in Healthcare & Allied Health. That said, popularity alone should not drive your decision. The right tool depends on your specific processes and integration needs. Clever Ops can advise based on what we have seen work for similar businesses.
Cliniko limitations: Per-practitioner pricing can be expensive for multi-disciplinary practices with many part-time practitioners. Inventory management for product sales (supplements, braces, etc.) is basic and requires workarounds or third-party tools. Neto limitations: Platform has undergone significant ownership changes (Neto to Maropost) creating uncertainty about long-term product direction. Website design templates are limited compared to Shopify and Squarespace, often requiring developer customisation for modern designs. Understanding these trade-offs in the context of your specific workflows is critical. Clever Ops can help you weigh which limitations matter most for your business during a free assessment.
If both tools are in the same category, you typically choose one as your primary system. However, some businesses run both during migration periods or for different teams. Cliniko and Neto share 1 common data types, making integration feasible. Clever Ops can sync them so your data stays consistent across both platforms.
Free trials are useful for testing the user interface, but they rarely reveal how a platform performs at scale, with your specific data model, or alongside your existing integrations. Cliniko manages 7 data object types and Neto manages 8. Evaluating that complexity in a trial period is difficult. A more efficient approach is to combine a short trial with expert advice from our Harvard-educated consultants, who can identify the right fit based on 12+ of implementation experience.
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons involving Cliniko or Neto.
Explore These Tools
Related Resources
Cliniko Integration Guide
Full integration capabilities for Cliniko.
Cliniko Alternative
Custom-built replacement for Cliniko.
Custom Software Development
Explore our custom software development services for Australian businesses.
Trades & Services Solutions
Automation solutions for trades & services businesses.
What is RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation)?
Learn how RAG combines the power of large language models with your business data to provide accurat...
Client Case Studies
See how Australian businesses automate with Clever Ops.
Cliniko vs ServiceM8
Another popular software comparison.
Neto vs ServiceM8
Another popular software comparison.
Pricing
Transparent pricing for automation services.
Need Help Choosing?
Join 50+ Australian businesses that trust Clever Ops for objective, vendor-neutral technology advice.
