Make vs n8n: Side-by-Side Feature & Pricing Comparison
Thinking of switching from Make to n8n (or vice versa)? This comparison covers features, costs, and migration considerations to help mid-market Australian businesses make an informed decision.
Feature Comparison
Side-by-side feature ratings for Make and n8n.
| Feature | Make | n8n | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow complexity | Make and n8n are evenly matched on workflow complexity, so your choice here comes down to preference and workflow fit. | ||
| Available integrations | n8n has a notable advantage in available integrations. | ||
| Error handling | Make and n8n are evenly matched on error handling, so your choice here comes down to preference and workflow fit. | ||
| Scheduling options | n8n has a notable advantage in scheduling options. | ||
| Conditional logic | Make significantly outperforms n8n on conditional logic, making it the stronger choice for businesses that prioritise this area. | ||
| Data transformation | Make and n8n are evenly matched on data transformation, so your choice here comes down to preference and workflow fit. | ||
| Monitoring and logging | n8n has a notable advantage in monitoring and logging. | ||
| Team collaboration | n8n has a notable advantage in team collaboration. | ||
| API flexibility | In terms of api flexibility, Make and n8n perform at a similar level, which is common for mature platforms in this space. | ||
| Pricing transparency | n8n has a notable advantage in pricing transparency. | ||
| Ease of setup | n8n has a notable advantage in ease of setup. | ||
| Value for money | n8n has a notable advantage in value for money. |
Workflow complexity
Make
n8n
Make and n8n are evenly matched on workflow complexity, so your choice here comes down to preference and workflow fit.
Available integrations
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in available integrations.
Error handling
Make
n8n
Make and n8n are evenly matched on error handling, so your choice here comes down to preference and workflow fit.
Scheduling options
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in scheduling options.
Conditional logic
Make
n8n
Make significantly outperforms n8n on conditional logic, making it the stronger choice for businesses that prioritise this area.
Data transformation
Make
n8n
Make and n8n are evenly matched on data transformation, so your choice here comes down to preference and workflow fit.
Monitoring and logging
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in monitoring and logging.
Team collaboration
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in team collaboration.
API flexibility
Make
n8n
In terms of api flexibility, Make and n8n perform at a similar level, which is common for mature platforms in this space.
Pricing transparency
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in pricing transparency.
Ease of setup
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in ease of setup.
Value for money
Make
n8n
n8n has a notable advantage in value for money.
Pricing Comparison
General pricing information for each platform.
Make
Free tier available; paid from ~$12/month
Pricing is indicative only and subject to change. We recommend contacting the vendor for a tailored quote based on your Australian business needs.
n8n
Free self-hosted; cloud from ~$24/month
These figures are estimates based on publicly available pricing. Actual costs depend on your usage, team size, and any negotiated rates.
Pros & Cons
An honest look at the strengths and limitations of each platform.
Make
Pros
- Cloud-based with reliable uptime
- Active user community and resources
- Real-time webhook support for instant data sync
- Mobile-friendly interface
- Handles key data types like scenarios and connections
Cons
- May not suit every workflow without customisation
- Costs can increase with usage volume
- Smaller market presence compared to category leaders
- Debugging failed automations requires patience
n8n
Pros
- Popular across Professional Services, Manufacturing, Logistics
- Well-established platform with strong market presence
- Reduces repetitive manual tasks
- Connects your existing tools without code
- Cloud-based with reliable uptime
Cons
- Onboarding documentation could be more comprehensive
- Support response times vary by plan tier
- May not suit every workflow without customisation
- Complex workflows may need technical knowledge
Best For
Which tool suits which use case.
Choose Make if you need
- ✓ Data synchronisation
- ✓ App integration
- ✓ Real-time data sync across platforms
- ✓ Professional Services businesses
- ✓ Moderate data needs (scenarios, connections)
Choose n8n if you need
- ✓ Process optimisation
- ✓ Moderate data needs (workflows, executions)
- ✓ Professional Services businesses
- ✓ Real-time data sync across platforms
- ✓ App integration
Expert Verdict
Our Harvard-educated consultants' take on this comparison.
Clever Ops Recommendation
Make has a significantly broader integration ecosystem than n8n, which can be a decisive factor if you rely on connecting multiple tools. That said, n8n may still be the better choice if its core features align more closely with your needs. Clever Ops evaluates the full picture — not just integration counts — when advising mid-market Australian businesses.
Migration Notes
What to know about switching between Make and n8n.
Migrating Between Make and n8n
Since Make and n8n are both automation tools, they share similar data structures — making migration more predictable. Clever Ops maps connections, webhooks, executions along with custom fields, automations, and workflows. We have completed similar automation migrations many times and typically finish within 4-8 weeks.
Make vs n8n FAQ
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons involving Make or n8n.
Explore These Tools
Connect These Tools
Already decided? See how to integrate Make and n8n seamlessly.
Need Help Choosing?
Join 50+ Australian businesses that trust Clever Ops for objective, vendor-neutral technology advice.