Every business has different workflows, team sizes, and budgets. This comparison of Acuity Scheduling vs Setmore helps you find the platform that matches your actual needs — not just the one with the biggest marketing budget.
Side-by-side feature ratings for Acuity Scheduling and Setmore.
| Feature | Acuity Scheduling | Setmore | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booking page customisation | Setmore holds a small advantage in booking page customisation. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision. | ||
| Calendar integrations | On calendar integrations, Setmore is marginally stronger — but Acuity Scheduling still delivers a solid experience here. | ||
| Team scheduling | Acuity Scheduling has a notable advantage in team scheduling. | ||
| Automated reminders | On automated reminders, Acuity Scheduling is marginally stronger — but Setmore still delivers a solid experience here. | ||
| Payment collection | Acuity Scheduling edges out Setmore on payment collection, though the gap is modest enough that other factors may matter more. | ||
| Buffer and availability rules | Acuity Scheduling has a notable advantage in buffer and availability rules. | ||
| Timezone handling | Acuity Scheduling holds a small advantage in timezone handling. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision. | ||
| Branding options | Acuity Scheduling has a notable advantage in branding options. | ||
| Group events | When it comes to group events, Setmore pulls clearly ahead of Acuity Scheduling — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team. | ||
| Analytics | Setmore holds a small advantage in analytics. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision. | ||
| Ease of setup | Setmore holds a small advantage in ease of setup. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision. | ||
| Value for money | Setmore holds a small advantage in value for money. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision. |
Booking page customisation
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Setmore holds a small advantage in booking page customisation. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision.
Calendar integrations
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
On calendar integrations, Setmore is marginally stronger — but Acuity Scheduling still delivers a solid experience here.
Team scheduling
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Acuity Scheduling has a notable advantage in team scheduling.
Automated reminders
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
On automated reminders, Acuity Scheduling is marginally stronger — but Setmore still delivers a solid experience here.
Payment collection
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Acuity Scheduling edges out Setmore on payment collection, though the gap is modest enough that other factors may matter more.
Buffer and availability rules
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Acuity Scheduling has a notable advantage in buffer and availability rules.
Timezone handling
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Acuity Scheduling holds a small advantage in timezone handling. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision.
Branding options
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Acuity Scheduling has a notable advantage in branding options.
Group events
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
When it comes to group events, Setmore pulls clearly ahead of Acuity Scheduling — a factor worth weighing if this capability is important to your team.
Analytics
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Setmore holds a small advantage in analytics. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision.
Ease of setup
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Setmore holds a small advantage in ease of setup. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision.
Value for money
Acuity Scheduling
Setmore
Setmore holds a small advantage in value for money. For most mid-market Australian businesses, this difference alone would not drive the decision.
General pricing information for each platform.
From ~$20/month
These figures are estimates based on publicly available pricing. Actual costs depend on your usage, team size, and any negotiated rates.
Free tier; paid from ~$12/user/month
Pricing may vary based on team size, features, and region. Contact the vendor for the latest Australian pricing.
An honest look at the strengths and limitations of each platform.
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Which tool suits which use case.
Our Harvard-educated consultants' take on this comparison.
Acuity Scheduling and Setmore are both proven scheduling platforms trusted by mid-market Australian businesses. The differences between them matter most in specific scenarios: integration requirements, budget constraints, and feature priorities. Rather than guessing, let our team of Harvard-educated consultants assess your needs and recommend the right fit — it is what we have been doing for 12+.
What to know about switching between Acuity Scheduling and Setmore.
Migrating between Acuity Scheduling and Setmore involves transferring appointments, availability and mapping custom fields. Clever Ops follows a structured migration process: discovery, data mapping, test migration, verification, and cutover. We typically complete migrations within 4-8 weeks. Historical data is preserved, and we run parallel systems during the transition to minimise risk. Post-migration, we provide 3 months of support to ensure everything runs smoothly.
Other popular comparisons involving Acuity Scheduling or Setmore.
Already decided? See how to integrate Acuity Scheduling and Setmore seamlessly.
Join 50+ Australian businesses that trust Clever Ops for objective, vendor-neutral technology advice.