Height or Teamwork? An Expert Project Management Comparison
Stop researching and start deciding. Our feature-by-feature comparison of Height and Teamwork gives mid-market Australian businesses the clarity they need - in minutes, not hours.
Feature Comparison
Side-by-side feature analysis for Height and Teamwork.
Task management
Height
AI-powered Smart Actions automate routine project management tasks like status updates, priority assignment, and duplicate detection
Teamwork
Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need
Both platforms are strong here. Height emphasises this as a core strength, and Teamwork also invests heavily in task management. Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.
Project views (board/list/timeline)
Height
AI-powered Smart Actions automate routine project management tasks like status updates, priority assignment, and duplicate detection
Teamwork
Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box
Both platforms are strong here. Height emphasises this as a core strength, and Teamwork also invests heavily in project views (board/list/timeline). Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.
Resource management
Height
AI-powered Smart Actions automate routine project management tasks like status updates, priority assignment, and duplicate detection
Teamwork
Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need
Both platforms are strong here. Height emphasises this as a core strength, and Teamwork also invests heavily in resource management. Review each platform's approach to see which aligns with your team's workflow.
Time tracking
Height
Limitation: No built-in time tracking, Gantt charts, or resource management, which professional services teams typically require
Teamwork
Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need
Teamwork highlights time tracking as a core strength. Height offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Collaboration tools
Height
Built-in chat alongside task lists creates contextual conversations tied to specific work items, reducing channel-switching between Slack and PM tools
Teamwork
Teamwork includes team collaboration features. Multi-user capabilities vary by plan tier
Height highlights collaboration tools as a core strength. Teamwork offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Reporting and dashboards
Height
Height includes reporting and dashboards capabilities. Feature depth varies by plan tier
Teamwork
Limitation: Reporting depth requires the higher-tier plans, with basic plans offering limited dashboard customisation and export options
Both platforms cover the reporting and dashboards basics. The edges - automations, reporting depth, mobile parity - are where their opinions show.
Customisation and templates
Height
Limitation: Smaller user base and community means fewer templates, guides, and third-party resources compared to established tools like Asana or Monday
Teamwork
Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box
Teamwork highlights customisation and templates as a core strength. Height offers the capability but does not position it as a primary differentiator.
Automations
Height
AI-powered Smart Actions automate routine project management tasks like status updates, priority assignment, and duplicate detection
Teamwork
Client-facing features including branded project portals, approval workflows, and shared notebooks keep external stakeholders informed
Edge cases in automations (bulk edits, exports, undo, permissions) are where Height and Teamwork diverge; map your five toughest scenarios and reproduce them in each trial.
Third-party integrations
Height
Limitation: Smaller user base and community means fewer templates, guides, and third-party resources compared to established tools like Asana or Monday
Teamwork
Limitation: Marketplace integrations are fewer than Monday.com, Asana, or ClickUp, sometimes requiring Zapier for connections
Teamwork has a broader native ecosystem (43+ integrations) compared to Height (31+). Both connect via automation platforms like Zapier and Make.
Mobile experience
Height
Height offers a mobile experience. Check the vendor site for current mobile app capabilities
Teamwork
Teamwork offers a mobile experience. Check the vendor site for current mobile app capabilities
For mobile experience, evaluate both platforms against your specific workflow requirements rather than feature lists alone. A free trial or vendor demo will clarify the differences.
Ease of setup
Height
Height is designed for straightforward onboarding with minimal configuration
Teamwork
Teamwork provides onboarding resources. Setup complexity depends on your configuration requirements
For ease of setup, evaluate both platforms against your specific workflow requirements rather than feature lists alone. A free trial or vendor demo will clarify the differences.
Value for money
Height
Limitation: The AI features, while promising, are still maturing and may not deliver consistent value across all project types
Teamwork
Free plan for up to 5 users. Deliver from approximately $13.99/user/month, Grow from approximately $25.99/user/month, Scale custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Time tracking included on all paid plans.
Pricing models differ significantly. Compare the total cost of ownership including add-ons and per-user fees, not just the headline price.
Pricing Comparison
General pricing information for each platform.
Height
Free plan available. Team from approximately $8.50/user/month, Business custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts available.
Prices shown are approximate and may differ based on your plan, team size, and billing cycle. Verify directly with the vendor for current AUD rates.
Teamwork
Free plan for up to 5 users. Deliver from approximately $13.99/user/month, Grow from approximately $25.99/user/month, Scale custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Time tracking included on all paid plans.
Pricing is indicative only and subject to change. We recommend contacting the vendor for a tailored quote based on your Australian business needs.
Pros & Cons
An honest look at the strengths and limitations of each platform.
Height
Pros
- AI-powered Smart Actions automate routine project management tasks like status updates, priority assignment, and duplicate detection
- Built-in chat alongside task lists creates contextual conversations tied to specific work items, reducing channel-switching between Slack and PM tools
- Cross-team task visibility with shared lists and filters helps break down silos between departments working on the same projects
- Clean, modern interface with fast performance and keyboard shortcuts appeals to teams that want simplicity without sacrificing features
- Flexible attributes (custom fields) with filtering and grouping let teams model their specific workflow without rigid structure
Cons
- Smaller user base and community means fewer templates, guides, and third-party resources compared to established tools like Asana or Monday
- No built-in time tracking, Gantt charts, or resource management, which professional services teams typically require
- Limited integration ecosystem compared to major project management platforms, with many connections requiring Zapier
- The AI features, while promising, are still maturing and may not deliver consistent value across all project types
Teamwork
Pros
- Purpose-built for client work with built-in time tracking, budgets, and billable hour management that agencies and consultancies need
- Project templates with task dependencies, milestones, and resource allocation provide structured project delivery frameworks out of the box
- Client-facing features including branded project portals, approval workflows, and shared notebooks keep external stakeholders informed
- Built-in invoicing from tracked time and expenses creates a direct path from project work to client billing
- Workload management with capacity planning helps managers balance team assignments across concurrent projects
Cons
- Per-user pricing with relatively high entry points makes Teamwork more expensive than alternatives for small teams not fully utilising project features
- The interface, while functional, is less visually polished than Monday.com or Asana, which can affect first impressions during team onboarding
- Reporting depth requires the higher-tier plans, with basic plans offering limited dashboard customisation and export options
- Marketplace integrations are fewer than Monday.com, Asana, or ClickUp, sometimes requiring Zapier for connections
Best For
Which tool suits which use case.
Choose Height if you need
- ✓ Task and project tracking
- ✓ Teams needing extensive third-party integrations
- ✓ Professional Services businesses
- ✓ Education organisations
- ✓ Moderate data needs (tasks, lists)
Choose Teamwork if you need
- ✓ Complex data models (projects, tasks, milestones and more)
- ✓ Professional Services businesses
- ✓ Workflow management
- ✓ Teams needing extensive third-party integrations
- ✓ Real-time data sync across platforms
Expert Verdict
Our Harvard-educated consultants' take on this comparison.
Clever Ops Recommendation
Choose Height if product and engineering teams that want a modern, AI-enhanced project management tool with built-in chat and fast performance, particularly those outgrowing simpler task managers. Choose Teamwork if agencies, consultancies, and professional services firms that bill clients for time and need project management with built-in time tracking, budgets, and client-facing project portals. Avoid Height if teams needing time tracking, Gantt charts, or extensive integrations, or organisations that prefer established platforms with larger support communities. Avoid Teamwork if internal teams that do not bill for client work, or small teams where the per-user cost is hard to justify against free or lower-cost alternatives like Trello or ClickUp. If you are still weighing the trade-offs, Clever Ops offers a free assessment where our Harvard-educated consultants map your requirements to the right platform.
Migration Notes
What to know about switching between Height and Teamwork.
Migrating Between Height and Teamwork
Since Height and Teamwork are both project management tools, they share similar data structures - making migration more predictable. Clever Ops maps tasks, messages along with custom fields, automations, and workflows. We have completed similar project management migrations many times and typically finish within 4-8 weeks.
Height vs Teamwork FAQ
Both platforms have their own setup considerations. Height manages 6 data object types and Teamwork manages 8, so configuration complexity scales with your data requirements. Clever Ops provides implementation support for both, typically completing setup within 2 weeks.
Height limitations: Smaller user base and community means fewer templates, guides, and third-party resources compared to established tools like Asana or Monday. No built-in time tracking, Gantt charts, or resource management, which professional services teams typically require. Teamwork limitations: Per-user pricing with relatively high entry points makes Teamwork more expensive than alternatives for small teams not fully utilising project features. The interface, while functional, is less visually polished than Monday.com or Asana, which can affect first impressions during team onboarding. Understanding these trade-offs in the context of your specific workflows is critical. Clever Ops can help you weigh which limitations matter most for your business during a free assessment.
Height may hit limits when teams needing time tracking, Gantt charts, or extensive integrations, or organisations that prefer established platforms with larger support communities. Teamwork may hit limits when internal teams that do not bill for client work, or small teams where the per-user cost is hard to justify against free or lower-cost alternatives like Trello or ClickUp. Both platforms are designed to grow with your business, but scaling experience varies. Height connects with 31+ tools, and Teamwork with 43+, so integration flexibility at scale is comparable. Clever Ops helps mid-market Australian businesses plan their tech stack for growth, not just for today.
Both Height and Teamwork serve Education businesses. Height is also popular with Professional Services organisations, while Teamwork is widely used in Professional Services. Clever Ops can advise based on what we have seen work for businesses like yours.
Yes, both platforms are used by Australian businesses. Height is popular with Professional Services and Education in Australia. Teamwork is widely used by Professional Services and Manufacturing. Key Australian considerations include AUD pricing, local support hours, GST handling, and data residency. Height offers Australian-specific pricing. Clever Ops, based in Gippsland, Victoria, factors these nuances into every recommendation.
Yes. Both platforms share 2 common data object types (including tasks, messages), which simplifies field mapping. Clever Ops runs a structured migration process: discovery, data mapping, test migration, verification, and cutover. Most migrations complete within 4-8 weeks, with 3 months of post-migration support included.
Height: Free plan available. Team from approximately $8.50/user/month, Business custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts available.. Teamwork: Free plan for up to 5 users. Deliver from approximately $13.99/user/month, Grow from approximately $25.99/user/month, Scale custom pricing (AUD). Annual billing discounts. Time tracking included on all paid plans.. When comparing costs, factor in per-user charges, add-on modules, and implementation costs, not just the headline price. Clever Ops can model the total cost of ownership for your team size during a free assessment.
Teamwork typically requires a longer onboarding period due to its 8 data object types and configuration depth. Height is generally quicker to get started with. With Clever Ops support, full onboarding for either platform, including configuration, data import, and team training, typically takes 4-8 weeks.
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons involving Height or Teamwork.
Connect These Tools
Already decided? See how to integrate Height and Teamwork seamlessly.
Related Resources
Connect Height to Teamwork
Set up automated data sync between these tools.
Teamwork Alternative
Custom-built replacement for Teamwork.
Custom Software Development
Explore our custom software development services for Australian businesses.
Trades & Services Solutions
Automation solutions for trades & services businesses.
Client Case Studies
See how Australian businesses automate with Clever Ops.
Monday.com vs Teamwork
Another popular software comparison.
Height vs Monday.com
Another popular software comparison.
Pricing
Transparent pricing for automation services.
Need Help Choosing?
Join 50+ Australian businesses that trust Clever Ops for objective, vendor-neutral technology advice.
